VirusTotal Graph++

Just 2 years ago we launched the first version of VirusTotal Graph. The goal was to provide a tool which understands the relationship between files, URLs, domains and IP addresses, and an easy interface to pivot and navigate over them.

To continue in this direction, today, we are releasing a set changes to help your investigations with VirusTotal Graph.

1. We have created a dashboard where you can see your graphs and the graphs created by the community.

You can also search for graphs with certain features, for example, graphs that contains a node with a label “c2”. The searches will go simultaneously to the public graph repository and to your private repository.

You can see the full list of search modifiers here.

2. We’ve improved the VirusTotal Graph UI with these features, most of them coming from our power users:

• Undo/redo
• In graph search
• Download the graph as JSON and as image
• Align nodes horizontally and vertically
• New ways of visualizing the graph

We’ve also included some extra features for our premium customers:

• Removed the API usage. If you are a premium customer you can use VT Graph extensively, its consumption won’t count against your API quota
• Added more commonality calculations
• Integration with VT Hunting - link

3. As most of our other products, VirusTotal Graph is getting a restful API. The documentation can be found here and a Python library to reduce the learning curve; it is available in our Github repository.

In the meanwhile we are cooking very exciting enhancements that we really hope will please the Community, stay tuned. As always, we would love to hear from you.

VirusTotal += Sangfor Engine Zero

We welcome the Sangfor Engine Zero to VirusTotal. In the words of the company:

“Sangfor Engine Zero (a.k.a SAVE engine in China) is an AI-powered malware inspection engine developed by the Sangfor Security Team and in use at some of the most influential and forward thinking enterprises globally. Engine Zero utilizes machine learning technology to analyze and synthesize input data. The combined power of Sangfor’s dedicated R&D and Security teams, comprised of data scientists, security analysts and white hat researchers, has produced Engine Zero’s unique, multi-dimentional features, able to detect and classify malicious files, sight unseen. Engine Zero surpasses traditional detection engines (feature/hash based) in its ability to: 1. Ability to identify new and unknown malware with no updates to the AI model 2. Proven industry-leading ransomware detection capabilities (successfully detected WannaCry, Globelmposter, GandCrab, CrySiS and their families) 3. Integrate and work in conjunction with the highly-automated Neural-X, Sangfor’s AI-enabled cloud platform for threat intelligence & analytics, to self-evolve and self-teach without human intervention.”

Sangfor has expressed its commitment to follow the recommendations of AMTSO and, in compliance with our policy, facilitates this review by SKD Labs, an AMTSO-member tester.

Pipelining VT Intelligence searches and sandbox report lookups via APIv3 to automatically generate indicators of compromise

TL;DR: VirusTotal APIv3 includes an endpoint to retrieve all the dynamic analysis reports for a given file. This article showcases programmatic retrieval of sandbox behaviour reports in order to produce indicators of compromise that you can use to power-up your network perimeter/endpoint defenses. We are also releasing a set of python scripts alongside this blog post to illustrate this use case.

We recently rolled out a new Windows dynamic analysis system called VirusTotal Jujubox. This new sandbox represents a major revamp of VirusTotal’s in-house behaviour analysis capabilities as well as a key addition to the multi-sandbox project, which already aggregates behaviour reports from more than 10 partners and the most popular operating systems.

Behaviour reports are often perceived as a mechanism to understand what an individual sample does when executed, a quick overview before diving into disassembly and debugging. However, when you have a massive dynamic analysis setup processing hundreds of thousands of files per day, the microscopic dissection capability is far from being the most attractive use case.

When you generate reports at scale, and more importantly, when you index them in an elasticsearch index and expose it via API, the generated data can be used for advanced hunting, especially when this data can be combined with other static, binary and in-the-wild properties.

The basic workflow would be as follows:

1. Periodically identify new malware variants pertaining to a family that you are tracking making use of the VT Intelligence search API. Use family variant commonalities (for instance a section name, the compilation timestamp or a document’s author metadata property) to retrieve a stream of malware.
2. Focus on recent matches since the previous execution (query: fs:2019-11-01+).
3. For each match, retrieve the generated behaviour reports for the pertinent file. You can also focus specifically on network communications with the contacted_ips, contacted_domains and contacted_urls relationships.
4. For each automatically extracted network observable, check popularity ranks in order to filter out noise and FPs.
5. All the newly yielded network artefacts (CnCs) can then be fed into SIEMs or transformed into IDS rules to power up network perimeter defenses.

Let’s illustrate this with a particular example. Bankbot is an Android banking trojan, it allows the attacker to perform:

• SMS hijacking.
• GPS tracking.
• New permission requests.
• Overlay attacks to mask legit bank apps with forms to intercept credentials. Sometimes based on a remote set of HTML templates. 

The trojan was released in an underground forum and the post included the source code for the client-side and server-side components, including the database setup to collect stolen information.




Initially, the trojan included a hardcoded list of target bank applications that it would overlay in order to intercept banking credentials:



Since the source code of the trojan was also published in the underground forum, other crooks soon modified it to accept a remote list of financial entities to attack. This makes target identification more complex, static analysis is not enough to identify the targeted banks and subsequent date-tied CnC infrastructure.



While identifying targeted financial institutions might be a more complex task, discovering new variants of the same family and automatically identifying new network infrastructure tied to it becomes easier. Why is this? A server-side remote target list leads to a common network infrastructure pattern that can be used to track the malware family.

This is an example of a Bankbot sample:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/5fdbe1e83ec9c43929cc348681cb6afde12afee637feaf444a4983c317b18423/detection

VT Enterprise allows similarity searches and other attribute searches to find additional variants of the same malware family. In this particular case, the Android package name under the details tab seems interesting, clicking on it will launch a VT Intelligence search for other Android APKs that share that very same package name:



The matches do indeed seem to belong to the same family:




When opening these samples and looking at their behaviour reports, certain commonalities are easily noticed:





Static/behaviour/code commonalities are very frequent since attackers usually reuse code across different campaigns. Sometimes the commonalities are a result of recompiling the same code to communicate with a different network infrastructure. Other times, commonalities are present because the attack binaries are generated with some kind of builder or kit for dummies. Similarly, CnC infrastructure often exhibits commonalities in terms of the same path structure or query parameters, it is the result of attackers reusing the same CnC panel through a server-side kit that they deploy without changing file names or path structure.

These patterns, in conjunction with VT’s massive dynamic analysis setup and indexing, make it easy to automatically discover new malicious network infrastructure and automatically generate indicators of compromise.

The behaviour reports for the identified cluster of samples shows that the CnC panel uses the subpaths tuk_tuk.php or checkPanel.php.

Let’s use this common pattern to periodically check VirusTotal for new variants of this malware family, and by doing so, let’s identify new network infrastructure tied to this attack, live, as samples are uploaded to VirusTotal.

Using the APIv3 Intelligence search endpoint, it’s possible to search for any Android APK whose network recordings contain the substring tuk_tuk.php:
https://developers.virustotal.com/v3.0/reference#intelligence-search
type:apk behaviour_network:"tuk_tuk.php"

Multiple properties, such as dynamic/static analysis and metadata, can be combined to make a more refined search:
type:apk behaviour_network:"tuk_tuk.php" behaviour:"del_sws" androguard:"android.permission.ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION"

The API can sort matches according to first seen descending, meaning that by executing this search periodically and focusing on the latest results, it’s possible to discover new malicious network infrastructure tied to this particular family.

At the time of writing, this search yielded the following results:

5fdbe1e83ec9c43929cc348681cb6afde12afee637feaf444a4983c317b18423
elis[.]ru
92.53.97[.]75
hxxp://elis.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php

52998a07d22b0aa267505635898219ef6104dc6cd255bea69c7ab701285666fa
xzcxzfs.kl.com[.]ua
5.79.66[.]145
hxxp://xzcxzfs.kl.com[.]ua/private/tuk_tuk.php

7c06552f59b594ef0d650204423e97c8ab8f07588f1215ec2a469dc9cb7f5670
u36084.test93w[.]ru
hxxp://u36084.test93w[.]ru/private/tuk_tuk.php

56b220e610d17987b4f96afa79e23c3c9cab16592384ed883e9ac8240907b53b
u36206.test93w[.]ru
185.31.163[.]148
hxxp://u36206.test93w[.]ru/private/tuk_tuk.php

The Intelligence search API endpoint will return a list of file objects matching a search criteria. Each of these file objects can have one or more multi-sandbox reports. These behaviour reports can be retrieved making use of the pertinent relationship (behaviours) for each of the files:
https://developers.virustotal.com/v3.0/reference#files-relationships

It’s also possible to filter the network communication relationships fields, instead of asking for the whole report (contacted_urls, contacted_ips, contacted_domains):
https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/intelligence/search?query=type:apk behaviour_network:”tuk_tuk.php”&relationships=contacted_urls,contacted_domains,contacted_ips

Once the pertinent network infrastructure is parsed, it’s possible to either rely on the objects returned by the network-related relationships (contacted_urls, contacted_ips, contacted_domains) or make a subsequent automated call to the domain / IP address / URL API endpoint in order to retrieve further details about the given network observable. The aim of this subsequent stage is to filter out potential false positives. For instance, among the details returned for a domain lookup, there are different popularity rank lists that can be useful to filter out TOP domains.

You can easily test this workflow with a little script released along with this blog post. This script makes use of our official APIv3 python library, it can serve as your starting point to build more complex pipelines:
https://github.com/VirusTotal/vt-py/blob/master/examples/intelligence_search_to_network_infrastructure.py

python3 intelligence_search_to_network_infrastructure.py --apikey=<YOUR_API_KEY> --query=’type:apk behaviour_network:"tuk_tuk.php"’

=== Results: ===
DOMAIN: u363571.test93w.ru
IP_ADDRESS: 185.31.163.148
URL: http://u363571.test93w.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: bot.mymaster-rem.ru
URL: http://bot.mymaster-rem.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: lensfor.xyz
URL: https://lensfor.xyz/private/tuk_tuk.php
IP_ADDRESS: 38.21.243.204
URL: http://38.21.243.204/anib/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: f0316480.xsph.ru
IP_ADDRESS: 141.8.192.151
URL: http://f0316480.xsph.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: u36255.test93w.ru
DOMAIN: mtalk4.google.com
IP_ADDRESS: 185.31.163.148
URL: http://u36255.test93w.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: u36206.test93w.ru
IP_ADDRESS: 185.31.163.148
URL: http://u36206.test93w.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: yumishop.co.uk
URL: http://yumishop.co.uk/private/inj_lst.php
URL: http://yumishop.co.uk/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: u36317.test93w.ru
IP_ADDRESS: 185.31.163.148
URL: http://u36317.test93w.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php
DOMAIN: u36317.test93w.ru
IP_ADDRESS: 185.31.163.148
URL: http://u36317.test93w.ru/private/tuk_tuk.php

Note that this workflow is exclusively based on behavioural observations and works independently of the detection ratio of files, by pipelining VT Intelligence searches and sandbox report lookups, it is possible to generate indicators of compromise even if the related sample is undetected. The identified domains can be automatically checked against SIEM logs or can be automatically transformed into IDS rules, serving as an additional layer in your onion-like security strategy.

This blog post focuses on combining VT Intelligence searches with behaviour lookups, the same can be done with YARA rule matches. VT Hunting Livehunt matches can programmatically retrieved using APIv3, for each match the pertinent behaviour reports can be retrieved and CnC network infrastructure can be automatically extracted. Similarly, other properties that can be used as IoCs, such as mutexes, registry keys, embedded domains, file names, cmd parameters and the like can be automatically yielded. The following two script showcase this other VT Hunting workflow:
https://github.com/VirusTotal/vt-py/blob/master/examples/hunting_notifications_to_network_infrastructure.py
https://github.com/VirusTotal/vt-py/blob/master/examples/retrohunt_to_network_infrastructure.py

If you are rather a golang fan, feel free to check out our official VirusTotal golang library:
https://github.com/VirusTotal/vt-go

APIv3 was a major component of our 2019 roadmap, soon we will be officially releasing it and announcing a generous deprecation timeline for APIv2, stay tuned!

VirusTotal += Bitdefender Theta

We welcome the Bitdefender Theta scanner to VirusTotal. This engine is 100% Machine Learning powered and reinforces the participation of Bitdefender that already had a multi-platform scanner in our service. In the words of the company:

“When it comes to pushing things forward in the fight against cyber-crime Bitdefender Theta checks all the boxes. This new technology stack makes use of deep neural networks to provide industry leading detection rates in the fight against ever changing cyber-attacks. Bitdefender Theta is 100% Machine Learning powered and built on top of Bitdefender's state of the art dynamic behavioral analysis and cloud services is used to identify and block threats without the need for daily signature updates.”

Bitdefender has expressed its commitment to follow the recommendations of AMTSO and, in compliance with our policy, facilitates this review by AV-Comparatives, an AMTSO-member tester.

Test your YARA rules against a collection of goodware before releasing them in production

The rising tide of malware threats has created an arms race in security tool accumulation, this has led to alarm fatigue in terms of noisy alerts and false positives. The last thing you need is more false alarms coming from buggy or suboptimal YARA rules, be it the ones you use in VT Hunting or the ones that you feed into your own security defenses.

As you may already know, VT Enterprise incorporates a component that allows you to match your own YARA rules against all newly uploaded files (Livehunt) as well as back in time against our historical malware collection (Retrohunt).

A common challenge for YARA users is that of potential false positives. False positives can have a negative effect on a users Livehunt feed by producing incorrect results. Similarly, a buggy rule can be a waste of your Retrohunt quota, and given that Retrohunt jobs are lengthy, it is also a waste of time. Since many security tools incorporate YARA these days, some users will be launching their rules against a fleet of machines that they manage, meaning that a buggy rule can be a big waste of resources.

In order to address this common pain point we are releasing a new Retrohunt feature: fast hunting over a goodware corpus. When you launch your Retrohunt jobs you can now select the corpus on which it should act:



The goodware corpus is a set of 1M files chosen from the NIST National Software Reference Library, accounting for 147GB. Jobs launched against this collection usually finish in under a minute. As such, we imagine that users may be modifying the way they use VT Hunting. Before writing a Livehunt YARA rule or launching a Retrohunt job, they probably will want to test it against this corpus and tweak the rule in order to prevent false positives and avoid unnecessary and lengthy Retrohunt iterations.



- Goodware Retrohunt jobs are correspondingly tagged -

In an effort to give back to the community behind VirusTotal and its premium services, we are making this feature entirely free. In other words, Retrohunt jobs against the goodware corpus do not consume Retrohunt quota.

This new feature builds upon some major improvements that have been recently released such as the new API endpoints to programmatically interact with VT Hunting. Stay tuned, soon we will be announcing far bigger enhancements to Retrohunt, you can take a sneak peek in our 2019 roadmap (Lightning-fast retrohunt).

Revamping in-house dynamic analysis with VirusTotal Jujubox Sandbox

VirusTotal Jujubox Sandbox in action:

This is a small datastudio set up to illustrate the kind of analytics that can be built with a massive dynamic analysis setup, generating IoCs. Note that there are several pages.

One of the main themes of VirusTotal’s 2019 roadmap is “Holistic Threat Profiling”. Some users never move beyond the basic use case for VT: checking hashes and looking at detections. However, that use case, while still core to VT, is by no means the most popular. VT also provides information on URLs, IPs and domains, and what’s more, it builds a graph that relates all of these observables. In an effort to allow users to identify the complete attack campaign, beyond the individual malware variants, we continue to introduce new tools and features. This new functionality allows users to characterize a threat from different points of view: static analysis, dynamic analysis, code analysis, relationship analysis, and more.

In our ongoing efforts to improve our behaviour analysis infrastructure we are happy to announce the rollout of a new Windows Sandbox that radically improves and complements our previous Windows XP SP1 analysis systems that was launched in 2012. The analyses generated by this new system are seamlessly showing up in new file reports, freely for the community. We are also complementing our threat feed offerings with a dynamic analysis feed derived from this new system, more on this later, let’s first focus on the community impact.

The project has been baptised as “Jujubox” (a reference to the type of bad karma - juju- objects it processes) and integrated in the context of the multi-sandbox project. This new sandbox is currently running Windows 7 and records the actions of Windows 32bit and 64bit binaries under 80MB when executed. It extracts information such as:

• File I/O operations.
• Registry interactions.
• Network traffic: HTTP calls, DNS resolutions, TCP connections, DGAs, etc.
• JA3 digests.
• Dropped files (and the interrelations between them).
• Mutex operations (Creation, Opening).
• Runtime Modules
• Highlighted text in windows, dialogs, etc.
• Highlighted winapi/syscalls
• AND MUCH MORE.

 

The information from the execution is indexed and searchable through VT Enterprise and fuels services such as VT Graph. Basically, any text found in these reports is indexed in an elasticsearch database. Each analysis also contains a fully revamped detailed HTML report, with improved filtering capabilities, allowing analysts to grasp the details of sample execution: syscalls, process tree and screenshots.






In order to access the detailed HTML report containing all windows API calls you just need to refer to the multi-sandbox action menu bar:



The detailed HTML report logs API calls and return values, meaning that it can greatly expand the observations contained in the summarized report view. You may refer to the following report in order to see an example of the full HTML report:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/7d77b3325afb5fe035ec7d3be6834570ce0c57088a90b15ebf73ce34211f59ff/behavior/VirusTotal%20Jujubox

Let’s take a look at some specific use cases that can be solved with this new setup.

 

Pivoting and mapping threat campaigns

After the analysis we can gather information from the sample and use it to either find relationships with other elements or to pivot to other campaign artifacts. This is an example illustrating the sandbox analysis:



This new setup contributes to the relationships created between samples and domains, allowing us to appreciate the DGA used by this particular malicious sample. The same goes for its dropped files. The sandbox analysis acts as a microscope, allowing us to better understand an individual threat. For instance, we can also take a look at where this malicious sample usually stores itself for persistence by checking the copied files and registry keys set:




Using inline hover pivots it is easy to find other reports showcasing this very same behaviour:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/7d77b3325afb5fe035ec7d3be6834570ce0c57088a90b15ebf73ce34211f59ff
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/f803e20e6dedb82ff778d8af9beead6fd8e07ae15425da03dc0654ca620ef2ac
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/09414ae9bf7be94edebe16546070ea219f3782bf0b83eabf10af6355ae531509
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/4de0f87fabf2f4dadd519f7a4ae7ca04207d7d8b0bf0661d8b60521f5cc3e59b/behavior/VirusTotal%20Jujubox

To pivot even further and find other similar files, we can use one of the advanced search operators to focus on file activity:
behaviour_files:"C:\Program Files\AVG\AVG9\dfncfg.dat" and sandbox_name:jujubox

Once you have discovered several variants pertaining to the same threat actor, it might be a good time to build a YARA rule and feed it into VT Hunting in order to track the evolution of the given malware family and understand better the attackers behind it.

 

Finding similar samples by mutexes

Mutexes are often reused by many samples, although most of them are usually common and legit, malware often chooses very characteristic names for its mutexes, making it easy to identify families and threat campaigns. This sample is a perfect example, it has a very specific mutex name:



By clicking on the mutex name we can find samples sharing the same behavior when it comes to mutex creation. Within VT Enterprise we can execute the query behavior:sfdkjjhgkdsfhgjksd to find such samples.

 

Pivoting on JA3

JA3 hashing is a way to fingerprint TLS client connections. In this particular report we can see a JA3 hash:



To pivot on this JA3 we click on the hash and generate the pertinent search query. This will use the behavior search modifier:
behavior:"706ea0b1920182287146b195ad4279a6"



Another JA3 example is to search for samples that use a Tor client:
behavior:"e7d705a3286e19ea42f587b344ee6865"

 

Programmatically interacting via API

All of the data described above is freely surfacing in APIv3, giving users a complementary characterization of their files beyond file reputation. A common use case is VT Enterprise users setting up YARA rules in VT Hunting in order to track malware variants or threat actors and then automatically retrieving file behavior reports for their notifications. These file behaviour reports are then data mined for patterns in terms of mutexes, contacted domains, file naming conventions, etc. in order to generate indicators of compromise that can be used power-up security defenses.

The following datastudio showcases the kind of insights that can be derived from aggregated study of behavioral observations, it clearly illustrates that by focusing on volume, and beyond that on malware families and clusters, it is sometimes straightforward to identify patterns and commonalities in order to generate alternative detection mechanisms for threats. Note that this datastudio has several pages.

 

Sandbox feed

This important effort to improve our free community capabilities is also being leveraged to radically improve our premium services. As seen in the datastudio above, when operating at scale we can make use of clustering and data mining in order to generate patterns and commonalities that can be fed into security defenses as yet one more mechanism in our onion layered security model.

As such, we are creating a new offering that expands our portfolio of feeds (file and URL feed), allowing users to retrieve all the dynamic analysis reports generated for files uploaded to VirusTotal. The value proposition is simple:

• Ingest every single sandbox dynamic analysis report generated for all files which are analyzed within VirusTotal sandbox. As of October 2019, we do our best to sandbox all PE EXE, MSI, Android, MacOS Mach-O/DMG/PKG files.
• Datamine the feed and identify domains, IP addresses, URLs, mutexes, registry keys, etc. that may be used as indicators of compromise to power-up your security toolset.
• Discover unknown malware flying under the radar of antivirus solutions by studying behavioral patterns.
• Implement complex behavior detection rules.

If you are interested in getting Early Access Preview to this service feel free to reach out to us. In future blog posts we will dive deeper into how the sandbox feed can be leveraged to improve security defenses, stay tuned.

VirusTotal multisandbox += VenusEye

VirusTotal multisandbox project welcomes VenusEye. The VenusEye sandbox is currently contributing reports on PE Executables, documents and javascript.

In their own words:

VenusEye Sandbox, as a core component product of VenusEye Threat Intelligence Center, is a cloud-based sandbox service focused on analyzing malwares and discovering potential vulnerabilities. The sandbox service takes multiple(~100) types of files as input, performs both static analysis and behavior analysis after then, and eventually generates a detailed human-readable report in several supported formats like PDF or HTML. Being weaponized with MITRE ATT&CK knowledge base, VenusEye Sandbox combines the product and the service as a whole. With the help of our sandbox service, users can track threat actors or gather threat intelligence for their hunting in a much easier way.

You can find VenusEye reports under the “Behavior” tab:




Take a look at a few example reports within VirusTotal:
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e728fbb5099d17dbe43b48e2fb5295fdd8a25f3790aac3e353c609b1745bd432/behavior/VenusEye%20Sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/6d395a6e0c6899b7bf827099f30cb5abf2da0e6bb766d730cf9cbe014b5e6a9f/behavior/VenusEye%20Sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/8c64086f3a31ebd87963b832e1327587499e0866dce9ad865363d2d2cb8b40c9/behavior/VenusEye%20Sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/0883847c6958cac651ebc2764ec5a5e223d29d5a0a80cb9e08b8ec83bfde6f00/behavior/VenusEye%20Sandbox
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/8143a2c2666575152896609c1d8d918717a358d4611a57a0cce2559e3c5cabbf/behavior/VenusEye%20Sandbox

Document with macros

Taking a look at the embedded content preview for the sample 8143a2c2666575152896609c1d8d918717a358d4611a57a0cce2559e3c5cabbf we see that the malware is attempting to trick users to enable macros.



The VenusEye sandbox automatically enables macros and allows us to see the execution details, including the HTTP requests, DNS resolutions and process tree.

Javascript files

Wide use of online email services that automatically block executable attachments has led to attackers using alternative file formats for their spam campaigns. As depicted above, documents with macros are one example, Javascript files have also become quite popular. VenusEye represents a very interesting addition to the multi-sandbox project in that, unlike some of the other integrated sandboxes, it also analyses javascript files.



In this particular example, the simple fact that a javascript file that can execute in Windows (as opposed to being a website resource) performs DNS resolutions should be enough to consider the file highly suspicious. More so if we take into account the registry keys with which it interacts:

Rich relationships

The two examples above illustrate VenusEye acting as a microscope to understand what an individual threat does. However, thanks to the network traffic recordings, VenusEye also contributes macroscopic patterns that can be easily understood using VT Graph.

For example, when looking at the javascript file above we can make use of the file action menu in order to open it in VT Graph:



By default a one level depth inspection is performed, but we can always dig deeper. By expanding the files communicating with poly1374.mooo.com we get to discover a Windows executable that seems to be using such domain as its command-and-control:



In other words, VenusEye also helps in tracking entire campaigns thanks to the contributed file/domain/IP/URL relationships.

Advanced pivoting

As usual, all of this information is indexed in the elasticsearch database powering VT Enterprise, this makes it trivial to pivot to other variants of a given malware family or other tools built by a same attacker.

Let us now return to the document with macros above, VT Enterprise users can click on any of the behavior report contents in order to launch a VT Intelligence search for files exhibiting the same pattern when executed. Let us click on the first HTTP request entry:



This launches the search behaviour_network:"http://mediaprecies.online/cgi-bin/58lt9/", finding other samples that communicate with that very same URL. Now that we have identified other variants belonging to the same campaign or threat actor, it is trivial to automatically generate commonalities that we can use as IoCs to power-up our security defenses:



Thank you VenusEye for joining the multi-sandbox family that aggregates more than 10 dynamic analysis partners and counting. If your organization has some kind of dynamic analysis setup, don’t hesitate to contact us to get it integrated in VirusTotal, we will be more than happy to grant you free VT Enterprise quota in exchange.